Wilderness Restoration: The Paradox of Public Participation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Paradox of Participation Experiments
An ongoing trend in technology policy has been to advocate participation. However, the author claims that lay citizens’ participation typically materializes in the form of a laboratory experiment at present. That is, lay participation as currently organized by professional participation experts under controlled conditions rarely is linked to public controversies, to the pursuit of political par...
متن کاملthe impact of e-readiness on ec success in public sector in iran the impact of e-readiness on ec success in public sector in iran
acknowledge the importance of e-commerce to their countries and to survival of their businesses and in creating and encouraging an atmosphere for the wide adoption and success of e-commerce in the long term. the investment for implementing e-commerce in the public sector is one of the areas which is focused in government‘s action plan for cross-disciplinary it development and e-readiness in go...
Is the Public Viewpoint of Wilderness Shifting ?
This study explores shifts since the mid-1990s in the values the public places on wilderness. Public views of the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS) were compared from national surveys conducted in 1994 and 2000. Results show that while more people in 2000 were aware of the NWPS, this increase in awareness has not created greater support for additional wilderness acreage. Levels of ...
متن کاملthe place of iranian public diplomacy in central asia
چکیده: نسبت به کارکرد و ماهیت دیپلماسی عمومی در جهان امروز نظریه های متعددی بیان گردیده و جایگاه آن در کنار نظریه های دیگر در محافل آکادمیک و دانشگاهی بررسی و تحلیل گردیده است. نظر به اهمیت دیپلماسی عمومی و جایگاه آن در سیاست خارجی ایران این نوشتار با تمرکز بر دیپلماسی عمومی در منطقه آسیای مرکزی تهیه و تنظیم شده است. این ضرورت از آنجا ناشی می شود که اولاً مفهوم دیپلماسی عمومی در سیاست خارجی ای...
15 صفحه اولThe population/biodiversity paradox. Agricultural efficiency to save wilderness.
“I know of no time which is lost more thoroughly than that devoted to arguing on matters of fact with a disputant who has no facts but only very strong convictions” (Simon, 1996). The comment aptly summarizes a common experience (including my own) in dealing with technophobes. In one sense, the genetic manipulation (GM) debate can only be conducted on a level in which the participants are prepa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Restoration Ecology
سال: 2006
ISSN: 1061-2971,1526-100X
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00160.x